8 March 2024, 13:15-14:45
Register start 12 February 2024
Register end 8 March 2024
Event
Adobe
Over the last two decades, a growing number of states have adopted new laws and mechanisms to address a longstanding gap in national criminal laws: the absence of meaningful procedures to raise post-conviction claims of factual innocence, including based on newly discovered evidence in death penalty cases. These legal and policy reforms respond to a surge of exonerations worldwide, facilitated by the growth of national innocence movements that are increasingly collaborating across national boundaries.
It is striking that these developments have occurred with little direct help from international law. Although the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and regional human rights treaties recognize extensive fair trial and appeal rights, no international human rights instrument – in its text, interpretation, or implementation – explicitly and fully recognizes the right to assert a claim of factual innocence. This omission has been described as international law’s ‘innocence gap’. An increasing number of scholars, innocence organizations, and civil society groups argue that international law should play a bigger role in pushing states to ensure meaningful opportunities for wrongfully convicted people to review their cases.
The speakers on this panel – co-organized by our Geneva Human Rights Platform with the European Innocence Network, University of Cincinnati College of Law, Ohio Innocence Project, Projet Innocence Suisse, Duke Law Center for International and Comparative Law and the Duke Law Wilson Center – will analyze the innocence gap in international law and discuss different strategies for achieving greater recognition of an international right to assert claims of factual innocence. The panel will draw upon the insights from efforts to promote other ‘new’ human rights and the experiences of beneficiaries of and participants in domestic advocacy on behalf of individuals who have been wrongfully convicted. In addition, two Europeans who served significant time in prison for crimes they did not commit will share their stories.
Disclaimer
This event may be filmed, recorded and/or photographed on behalf of the Geneva Academy. The Geneva Academy may use these recordings and photographs for internal and external communications for information, teaching and research purposes, and/or promotion and illustration through its various media channels (website, social media, newsletters, annual report, etc.).
By participating in this event, you are agreeing to the possibility of appearing in the aforementioned films, recordings and photographs, and their subsequent use by the Geneva Academy.
adobe
Our latest research brief critically explores how, under the guise of national security, governments misuse laws and narratives to target minorities and suppress political opposition.
Geneva Academy
The Geneva Human Rights Platform hosted an expert roundtable with the theme 'Opportunities for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Human Rights Monitoring.'
This training course will delve into the means and mechanisms through which national actors can best coordinate their human rights monitoring and implementation efforts, enabling them to strategically navigate the UN human rights system and use the various mechanisms available in their day-to-day work.
UN Photo / Jean-Marc Ferré
This training course will explore the origin and evolution of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and its functioning in Geneva and will focus on the nature of implementation of the UPR recommendations at the national level.
Olivier Chamard / Geneva Academy
The Treaty Body Members’ Platform connects experts in UN treaty bodies with each other as well as with Geneva-based practitioners, academics and diplomats to share expertise, exchange views on topical questions and develop synergies.
Geneva Academy
Geneva Academy