Aligning Regulations of Business Conduct in the Technology Sector with Human Rights

Concerns regarding the human rights impact of business conduct in the technology sector are not new – whether related to the dissemination of illegal content via online platforms, data collection or online surveillance.

While there is agreement about the need to better regulate technology company conduct, it remains essential to place international human rights law (IHRL) at the centre of regulatory and policy frameworks.

The United Nations (UN) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) provide important guidance to policymakers on ensuring that their regulatory efforts align with a human rights-based approach and IHRL.

A new Research Brief by the Geneva Academy and the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) B-Tech project on Regulating Business Conduct in the Technology Sector: Gaps and Ways Forward in Applying the UNGPs depicts the prominent gaps in regulatory approaches to business conduct in the technology sector with regard to the UNGPs. Further, the research brief suggests how such alignment could be improved and sketches ongoing conceptual work by the OHCHR B-Tech project on engaging with policymakers for enhanced uptake of the UNGPs in technology regulation.

Written by our Senior Research Fellow Dr Ana Beduschi and by Dr Isabel Ebert, Adviser to the OHCHR B-Tech Project and Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for Business Ethics at the University of St. Gallen, it draws on our research project on disruptive technologies and rights-based resilience – funded by the Geneva Science-Policy Interface and conducted in partnership with OHCHR B-Tech Project.

Identifying Prominent Gaps in Regulation

The publication starts by identifying the prominent gaps in UNGPs' alignment in regulatory efforts and their subsequent risks for human rights.

‘Our research highlights that existing regulatory efforts on technology company conduct show a mixed picture with regards to their alignment with the UNGPs’ underlines Dr Beduschi.

Gaps include a narrow view of human rights, the inconsistent use of human rights due diligence terminology, a narrow scope on a tier in the value chain, a lack of accompanying measures and enforcement mechanisms, a prescriptive list of non-permissible activities or a focus on protected artifacts, the absence of a ‘balancing test’, and the lack of clear provisions for access to remedy.

Concrete Recommendations and Essential Regulation Building Blocks

The Research Brief proposes concrete recommendations on how regulatory processes could be better aligned with the UNGPs. Further, the research brief presents ongoing work by the OHCHR B-Tech Project in developing a guidance tool to inform policymakers on the policy and design choices when regulating technology company conduct in a manner which is consistent with the UNGPs.

‘A UNGPs-based approach to regulation ensures the development of a coherent regulatory landscape that is aligned with international human rights standards. This is key to avoid negative human rights impacts related to technology company conduct’ underlines Dr Ebert.

The publication also sketches three essential building blocks – or phases – for policymakers when regulating technology company conduct:

  1. Defining the ‘objective’ by a sound identification of the ‘problem’ that the regulatory effort is trying to solve and what constitutes the regulatory gap.
  2. Discussing and weighing the possible policy choices, bearing in mind the earlier mentioned mix of regulatory and voluntary measures available.
  3. Transposing the choices made in the two previous steps into design elements.

‘A strong stakeholder engagement along all stages of the regulatory development process is vital to the success of the process. Our cooperation with the Geneva Academy has supported our project in bringing this important message across to key stakeholders’ says Lene Wendland, Chief of Business and Human Rights at OHCHR.

‘As highlighted by the recent adoption of the EU Digital Services Act, many governments are currently developing regulations on this issue. This publication will be of use to policy-makers working on such regulations, both regarding their content but also regarding the process leading to their adoption’ explains Felix Kirchmeier, Manager of Policy Studies at the Geneva Academy.

MORE ON THIS THEMATIC AREA

Cable network photo News

Assessing the Impact of Novel Technologies for Humanitarian Protection in Armed Conflict

10 May 2022

Our new Working Paper provides an overview of the various novel technologies that together form part of the ‘future digital battlefield’ and assesses some of the implications they have for humanitarian protection in armed conflict.

Read more

Helmer Jonelid and Edward Millett in front of Villa Moynier entrance News

Mandela Moot Court: Geneva Academy Team Reaches the Final Rounds

20 June 2022

The Geneva Academy team at the 2022 Mandea Moot Court – Helmer Jonelid and Edward Millett – qualified for the final rounds of the competition that will take place in Geneva from 18 to 21 July 2022.

Read more

Logo of the Atlas Network Event

Women's Perspectives on a Career in International Law

6 July 2022, 13:00-14:30

In this online event co-organized with the ATLAS Network, prominent women in international law will share their experience and advice through an interactive discussion.

Read more

Prison visit by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in Haiti Short Course

The Implementation of International Human Rights Law

Fall 2022

This short course, which can be followed in Geneva or online, aims at presenting the institutions and procedures in charge of the implementation of international human rights law.

Read more

A general view of participants during of the 33nd ordinary session of the Human Rights Council. Training

The Universal Periodic Review and the UN Human Rights System: Raising the Bar on Accountability

7-11 November 2022

This training course will explore the origin and evolution of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and its functioning in Geneva and will focus on the nature of implementation of the UPR recommendations at the national level.

Read more

Session of a UN Treaty Body Project

Treaty Bodies Individual Communications Procedures

Started in January 2019

Read more

View of a session of the UN Human Rights Council Project

Human Rights Conversations

Started in January 2020

A series of events aimed at discussing contemporary issues and challenges related to the promotion and protection of human rights in Geneva and beyond.

Read more

Cover of the publication Publication

Implementing the Treaty Body Review 2020 – Where do we stand

published on May 2022

Felix Kirchmeier, Chloé Naret, Domenico Zipoli

Read more