UN Photo / Jean-Marc Ferre
28 November 2019
The United Nations (UN) Universal Periodic Review (UPR) has brought new life into the measures taken at the international and national levels to hold states accountable to their international human rights law (IHRL) obligations. The UPR has also generated a number of new initiatives at national levels to implement recommendations emanating from the UPR process.
In the context of the upcoming review of UN treaty bodies (TBs) by the UN General Assembly (GA), the Research Brief The Universal Periodic Review Mid-Term Reporting Process: Lessons for the Treaty Bodies attempts to draw lessons from the UPR mid-term reporting process that can assist TBs in improving the impact of their work at the national level.
Written by Miloon Kothari, President of UPR Info and former UN Special Rapporteur on the right to adequate housing, it outlines a series of measures, inspired by the UPR, to strengthen the implementation of TBs concluding observations.
‘This report will be of interest to the various stakeholders involved in the UNGA 2020 review process, but also to the actors involved in the work of UN TBs: state parties to the treaties, members of the various committees, NGOs and staff in UN agencies interacting with the UN human rights system, as well as National Human Rights Institutions’ underlines Felix Kirchmeier, Executive Director of the Geneva Human Rights Platform.
The Research Brief details a series of UPR good practices – the creation of stakeholder and multi-stakeholder mechanisms involving governments, National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs), parliaments and civil society organizations; the development of national human rights action plans and the development of matrices and tools to track implementation – that can be of value for the follow-up of UN TBs’ concluding observations.
‘It is essential that during the discussions towards the reform of UN TBs, serious consideration is given to the many lessons that can be learnt from the follow-up processes spawned by the UPR’ underlines Miloon Kothari.
The paper also calls, based on the UPR analysis, to move towards a consolidated national monitoring and implementation process for all recommendations emanating from the UN human rights system.
‘Some of this work is already taking place through the matrices developed to track the implementation of UPR recommendations as they also integrate UN TBs’ concluding observations and recommendations from UN Special Procedures, but there is a critical need for a better coordinated and mutually reinforcing approach’ stresses Miloon Kothari.
This will not only lead to a more coherent and coordinated UN human rights system, but also to an efficient national and comprehensive process that will reduce significantly the reporting burden on states, NHRIs and NGOs’ he adds.
Arthur Nguyen dao
Every year, at the Graduation Ceremony, three students are rewarded for their exceptional academic work via three prizes: the Henry Dunant Research Prize, the Best LLM Paper Prize and the Best MTJ Paper Prize.
Our two LLM students, Anna Lochhead-Sperling and Paula Padrino Vilela participated in the oral rounds of the Nelson Mandela Moot Court. A great opportunity to put into practice the human rights notions learned in class, meet other law students from all around the world and train public speaking and presentation skills.
This event, co-organized with the ATLAS Network will feature prominent women in international law. Coming from different professional backgrounds, they will share their experience and advice through an interactive discussion.
UN Photo / Jean-Marc Ferré
This training course will explore the origin and evolution of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and its functioning in Geneva and will focus on the nature of implementation of the UPR recommendations at the national level.
From its adoption to its content and implementation, this training course provides a comprehensive overview of the United Nations Declaration on the rights of peasants, as well as tools to protect and promote the rights of peasants, rural women, fisher, pastoralist and nomadic communities, as well as agricultural workers.
We are a partner of the Human Rights, Big Data and Technology Project, housed at the University of Essex’s Human Rights Centre, which aims to map and analyse the human rights challenges and opportunities presented by the use of big data and associated technologies. It notably examines whether fundamental human rights concepts and approaches need to be updated and adapted to meet the new realities of the digital age.